A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out between possible neighbours above the development of the wall at a coastal internet site in a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has captivated countrywide interest adhering to an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed relatives home at Sutton Strand, in which allegations of setting up breaches, environmental concerns, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Moments short article about René Collier and the Irish Occasions write-up about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a local disagreement has developed into a extremely publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than construction operates at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and an organization director respectively, look for to build their family members house. The situation happens to be emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections as well as sensitivities of recognized citizens. According to the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining manufactured by their possible neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted less than setting up permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both inhabitants of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms of their planning authorization by developing a wall over and above the boundaries in their web site, bringing about an encroachment on the Distinctive Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, as a result areas are subject matter to strict controls beneath European and Irish environmental law. Within their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments might have Long lasting ecological implications, specially inside a sensitive coastal natural environment like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach in their preparing permission, and say the wall, which happens to be partially constructed, is in the right situation. Their legal crew has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful progress. The pair accuse litigants of seeking to halt homebuilding in an effort to protect their watch, an allegation which has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal organizing disputes, in which views of the sea are each extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic endeavours via the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the location, In keeping with sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Moments. In a single account, Rene Collier waded as a result of midsection-large water during a storm to photograph the site Irish Situations, a picture which has because become emblematic of your depth on the dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were meant to Get visual proof from the wall’s posture relative to tidal traces and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from your sea Irish Times described, describing how the two Guys entered the h2o for the duration of intense weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm water to photograph the location turned Among the most striking descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Times write-up about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that this kind of actions ended up cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ belief which the wall prolonged into a region afflicted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was staying encroached upon.
The gatherings at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were coated in detail through the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 turned greatly searched phrases as audience sought to know the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court read further submissions on no matter whether interim orders really should be granted to halt design pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential second inside the legal timeline.
In the Main of your dispute is usually a disagreement around boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage the wall, as created, goes past what was authorized and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has actually been referred to as meticulous in his assessment of scheduling paperwork, maps, and situations attached to your permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both stressed that their motion is determined by issue for environmental safety and adherence to planning legislation. They reject claims that the case is about preserving a private perspective, insisting as a substitute that it's about making sure that development at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limits. In affidavits, they've got explained their lengthy-standing link to the region and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a pair just endeavoring to develop a relatives house in accordance Along with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Specific Space of Conservation and say that all operates are performed according to Specialist assistance and approved ideas. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes coming into the sea for the duration of a storm, will not alter the underlying specifics.
The case has also raised broader questions about how planning disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute around design of wall at coastal web page happens to be a shorthand description for just a problem that numerous observers see as significantly popular. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming extra contentious.
The Irish Situations posting about René Collier observed the businessman experienced Earlier been associated with local advocacy on setting up and environmental troubles, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Instances article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from quite various Experienced backgrounds can find them selves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous Using the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site through the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waistline-superior water for the duration of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Instances and René Collier waded by midsection-higher drinking water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both the physical reality in the coastline along with the symbolic mother nature of your act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these actions shown determination; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an too much solution.
As the High Court proceedings keep on, the result continues to be unsure. The courtroom have to ascertain if the wall as created complies with arranging permission and no matter whether any encroachment into a Unique Region of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are advanced, involving interpretation Irish Times article about accountant Paul Feely of maps, tidal facts, and arranging problems. But the human component continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Dwell alongside one another prolonged following the legal costs are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than design performs at the positioning on Dublin Highway, Sutton, although the implications of the case prolong past that handle. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the importance of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. In addition it underscores how speedily an area disagreement can escalate when basic challenges for example environmental protection and property legal rights are perceived for being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of normal beauty and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre of your dispute stands partly constructed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved authorized thoughts. Regardless of whether it can finally be altered, eliminated, or accomplished as planned will rely on the courtroom’s results. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will possible continue to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to Probably the most closely watched preparing disputes in north Dublin in recent years.